4.7 Article

Oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 augments protection against influenza virus infection in mice

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 199-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.11.019

关键词

Influenza virus; Mice; Lactobacillus peritosus strain b240; Immunoglobulin A

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23790919] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host-defense mechanisms against influenza virus (IFV) infection involve both innate and acquired immunities. Among other components, secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in the airway mucosa plays a particularly pivotal role in preventing IFV infection. Among 150 strains of lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus pentosus strain b240 (b240) has the highest IgA-inducing potency in mouse Peyer's patch cells. We previously reported a practical new finding that oral ingestion of nonviable heat-killed b240 elevates salivary IgA secretion in humans. The present study aimed to determine if nonviable b240 can prevent IFV infection in mice. In a BALB/c mouse model infected with lethal levels of IFV A/PR8/34 (H1N1), oral administration of b240 for 3 weeks by gavage prior to IFV infection significantly prolonged the survival period. For IFV infection at nonlethal levels, the infectious titers of IFV in the lungs 7 days after infection were significantly reduced after similar b240 administration. Both anti-IFV IgA and immunoglobulin C titers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma on day 7 were significantly higher in the b240-treated group than the control group. The augmentation of the anti-IFV immune response by b240 application was preliminarily confirmed by the elevated production of IFV-driven T-cell factors during mixed lymphocyte reactions with b240-primed splenocytes. These results suggest that oral nonviable heat-killed b240 intake can facilitate protection against IFV infection. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据