4.7 Article

Kiovig for primary immunodeficiency: Reduced infusion and decreased costs per infusion

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 1358-1361

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.04.021

关键词

Belgium; Cost-minimization analysis; Kiovig; Primary immunodeficiency

资金

  1. Baxter Healthcare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kiovig is a ready-to-use 10% liquid immunoglobulin preparation that is medically indicated for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency. This study aims to conduct an economic evaluation which compares the intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preparations Kiovig, Multigam, and Sandoglobulin from the Belgian societal perspective. As three prospective studies have observed no difference in outcomes, a cost-minimization analysis is considered appropriate to evaluate differences in treatment costs that can arise from IVIgs. A decision-analytic model simulated treatment costs attributed to one infusion. Resource use data were derived from a Dutch costing study. Cost items included immunoglobulin costs, pharmacy administration and nursing costs, mini-forfait for hospital infusion, costs of adverse events, and lost productivity with 2009 as base year. Cost data were identified from published sources and Belgian hospital administrators. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis explored the impact of parameter uncertainty on cost results. Costs per infusion cycle in adult primary immunodeficiency patients were (sic)1,046 (95% confidence interval: (sic)1,006-1,093) with Kiovig; (sic)1,102 ((sic)1,064-1,147) with Multigam; and (sic)1,147 ((sic)1,108-1,193) with Sandoglobulin. The average cost savings per infusion with Kiovig as compared to Multigam and Sandoglobulin amounted to (sic)56 and (sic)101 per infusion. In conclusion, treatment costs with Kiovig were shown to be lower as compared to other IVIgs in Belgium. Reduced costs per infusion were attributed to lower costs associated with treating adverse events and the opportunity cost of nursing time and time off work for working adults. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据