4.7 Article

The effects of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells expanded with CD28 superagonist antibody in DSS-induced mice colitis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 610-617

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.11.034

关键词

Antibody; Colitis; Foxp3; Inflammatory bowel disease; Regulatory T cell

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20390349, 21659310, 2109739]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation [08ZR1402100]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21659310, 20390349] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulatory T (Treg) cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the present study, we found that a superagonistic CD28-specific monoclonal antibody (supCD28mAb. D665) could preferentially stimulate expansion of CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cells. Foxp3(EGFP) mice were orally administrated with 3.5% DSS for 5 days, and intraperitoneally injected supCD28mAb 1 mg/mice in treated group. All of the mice were sacrificed on day 8, and both clinical and histological parameters showed that the severity of colitis was significantly reduced in treated group compared to controls. In treated group, the proportion of CD103, CD152 and CD62L expression on Foxp3+Treg cells in the spleen and mesenteric lymph node were higher than controls. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis showed that expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, TCF-beta was significantly increased in treated group. Taken together, our data demonstrated that supCD28mAb targets CD4+Foxp3+Treg cells expansion in vivo, maintains and enhances their regulatory functions, to reduce the damage of colon in dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced mouse colitis by secreting a large amount of IL-10. It represents a major advance towards the therapeutic use of polyclonally activated Treg cells as cellular therapy for treatment of IBD. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据