4.7 Article

Oral administration of a soluble 1-3, 1-6 β-glucan during prophylactic survivin peptide vaccination diminishes growth of a B cell lymphoma in mice

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 1298-1303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2009.07.013

关键词

A20 lymphoma; beta-glucan; Survivin; Tumor peptide vaccination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-glucans are biological response modifiers with activatory effects on macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), granulocytes and NK cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of a soluble yeast-derived beta-(1-3), (1-6)-D-glucan on prophylactic peptide vaccination against the B cell lymphoma A20 in syngeneic Balb/c mice. We found that repeated immunizations with two MHC class-I restricted peptides derived from the tumor antigen survivin combined with oral co-administration of beta-glucan could significantly diminish intradermal tumor growth, whereas peptide vaccination alone failed to control tumor growth. beta-glucan as single agent induced only a weak but non-significant growth inhibitory effect. To determine whether the tumor inhibitory effect of the combined treatment was associated with the induction of a tumor-specific immune response we quantified splenic DC and macrophages, analyzed the maturation of DC and measured the frequency of peptide-specific CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells. Treated mice showed significantly increased numbers of splenic macrophages and mature DC compared to untreated tumor-bearing mice. After restimulation with both peptides in vitro elevated levels of interferon (IM)-gamma-secreting CD8(+) T cells were found in two of four tested mice following treatment and one of four mice showed a strong increase of interleukin (IL)-4-secreting CD4(+) T cells. Our data reveal a beneficial effect of beta-(1-3), (1-6)-D-glucan in tumor growth inhibition by tumor-specific peptide vaccination which may rely on a function of the polymeric sugar as immunological adjuvant. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据