4.5 Article

Methylation of CIITA promoter IV causes loss of HLA-II inducibility by IFN-γ in promyelocytic cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1457-1466

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxn103

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)
  2. National Research Project on AIDS [40F.1, 45G.1]
  3. Fondi di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2006-2007
  4. Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Insubria
  5. Italian Ministry of Health, Ordinary Project
  6. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human promyelocytic cell line THP-1 expresses high level of HLA class II (HLA-II) molecules after IFN-gamma treatment. Here, we report a variant of THP-1 that does not express HLA-II after IFN-gamma. The variant's HLA-II phenotype is constant over time in culture and it is not related to a defective IFN-gamma-signalling pathway. Transfection of CIITA, the HLA-II transcriptional activator, under the control of a cytomegalovirus promoter rescues high level of HLA-DR surface expression in the variant indicating that the biosynthetic block resides in the expression of CIITA and not in the CIITA-dependent transactivation of the HLA-II promoters. Treatment of the variant with 5-azacytidine (5-aza), which inhibits CpG methylation, restores inducibility of HLA-II by IFN-gamma both at transcriptional and phenotypic level and antigen presenting and processing function of the variant. DNA studies demonstrate that the molecular defect of the THP-1 variant originates from the methylation of the CIITA promoter IV. Furthermore, treatment with 5-aza produces a substantial demethylation of CIITA promoter IV and a significant increase of IFN-gamma-dependent HLA-II expression in another myelomonocytic cell line, U937. Therefore hyper-methylation of CIITA promoter IV may be a relevant mechanism of epigenetic control preventing HLA-II IFN-gamma inducibility in the myelomonocytic cell lineage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据