4.6 Article

Late Devonian-early Permian accretionary orogenesis along the North Tianshan in the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt

期刊

INTERNATIONAL GEOLOGY REVIEW
卷 57, 期 5-8, 页码 1023-1050

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2014.913268

关键词

Tianshan; Central Asian Orogenic Belt; ophiolite; ridge subduction; roll-back

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41230207, 41390441, 41190075, 41202150]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Major State Mafic Research Development Programme of China [2007CB411307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Palaeozoic orogenic process in the North Tianshan of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt is controversial. Systematic field study indicates that the ophiolitic fragments of the North Tianshan are mainly thrust slices and blocks of a late Palaeozoic accretionary complex, which was intruded by granitoids. U-Pb zircon dating of plagiogranites from the North Tianshan ophiolite yielded a mean age of 343.1 +/- 2.7 Ma. These are typical oceanic plagiogranites but with a supra-subduction zone (SSZ) signature. Ophiolitic basalts display N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB compositions. One gabbro with an age of 301.9 +/- 2.2 Ma shows E-MORB geochemistry mixed with N-MORB and OIB. Some andesites show clear island arc characters indicated by enrichment of LILEs relative to HFSEs. Mean ages of 344.9 +/- 4.2 and 298.7 +/- 2.4 Ma were obtained for a granite porphyry and a mylonitic granite, respectively. The two granitoids display an island arc geochemical signature evidenced by enrichment of LILEs and depletion of HFSEs. Combined with an eastward migration of Late Devonian to Carboniferous arc magmatism and related Cu-Au-Mo deposits, we propose that trench retreat and slab roll-back took place during subduction of the Junggar Ocean spreading ridge beneath the North Tianshan arc, and that the accretion may have lasted into early Permian time, an important late stage of the long-lived accretionary orogenesis in the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据