4.5 Article

Relationships between the antibacterial activity of sodium hypochlorite and treatment time and biofilm age in early Enterococcus faecalis biofilms

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 48, 期 8, 页码 782-789

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12376

关键词

antibacterial activity; biofilm age; Enterococcus faecalis biofilms; sodium hypochlorite; treatment time

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012K2A1A 2029691]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo determine the relationships between the antibacterial activity of NaOCl and treatment time and biofilm age in early Enterococcus faecalis biofilms using a linear fitting procedure. MethodologyEnterococcus faecalis biofilms were formed on hydroxyapatite discs. To investigate the relationship between the antibacterial activity of NaOCl and biofilm age, 22-, 46-, 70- and 94-h-old biofilms were exposed to NaOCl (0-3%) for 5min. To investigate the relationship between the antibacterial activity of NaOCl and treatment time, 70-h-old biofilms were exposed to NaOCl (0-3%) for 1, 3, 5 and 7min. After treatment, colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted. To determine the relationships between these variables, linear fitting was performed. ResultsThe change in the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) of NaOCl followed a linear pattern of biofilm age (R=0.941, R-2=0.886) or treatment time dependence (R=-0.948, R-2=0.898). Below the MBEC, the fitting lines for bacterial CFU count versus NaOCl concentration (R-0.973, R(2)0.948) in the 22-, 46-, 70- and 94-h-old biofilms implied that the antibacterial activity of NaOCl decreased as the biofilm age increased. The fitting lines for bacterial CFU count versus NaOCl concentration (R-0.970, R(2)0.942) in the 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-min treatments implied that the antibacterial activity of NaOCl increased with treatment time. ConclusionsThese results suggest that the antibacterial activity of NaOCl against early E.faecalis biofilms in root canals may follow a linear pattern depending on biofilm age or treatment time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据