4.5 Article

Unintentional extrusion of mineral trioxide aggregate: a report of three cases

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 1165-1176

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02082.x

关键词

apexification; apical plug; healing; mineral trioxide aggregate; overfilling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nosrat A, Nekoofar MH, Bolhari B, Dummer PMH. Unintentional extrusion of mineral trioxide aggregate: a report of three cases. International Endodontic Journal, 45, 1165-1176, 2012. Aim Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is the material of choice for apical barrier techniques during root canal treatment of teeth with open apices. However, the precise control of MTA during the placement of an apical plug is challenging. This article describes the outcomes of unintentional extrusion of MTA into the periradicular tissue during apical barrier treatment in three cases. Three cases of maxillary central incisors in adult patients with open apices were referred for treatment. After conventional access and canal preparation, MTA was placed into the apical portion of the root canals to act as an apical barrier/plug. A large increment of MTA was extruded in all cases. In Case 1, after a 4-year follow-up, the extruded MTA had resorbed and the periradicular lesion had healed. In Cases 2 and 3, after follow-up, the patients remained symptomatic and were scheduled for periradicular surgery. In Case 2, soft unset particles of MTA were present in the lesion and were curetted. In Case 3, the extruded MTA had set hard but was sandwiched between the oral mucosa and bone; its removal relieved the pain experienced on buccal palpation. Key learning points Extruded MTA may not harden and may be associated with ongoing periapical irritation; Extruded set MTA when encapsulated in the mucosa and not surrounded by bony matrix may act as a mechanical irritant on palpation; Mineral trioxide aggregate should be confined to the root canal system; Teeth where MTA has been extruded beyond the foramen should be followed-up to monitor the outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据