4.5 Article

Effects of altering the Si/Ca molar ratio of a calcium silicate cement on in vitro cell attachment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 337-345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01981.x

关键词

calcium silicate cement; cell attachment; endodontic material; gene expression; setting time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To examine the effects of altering the Si/Ca molar ratio (6 : 4, 5 : 5, and 4 : 6) of a quick-setting calcium silicate cement on in vitro cell attachment. Methodology Working time and setting time of three different calcium silicate cements were measured. Alamar Blue was used for real-time and repeated monitoring of cell attachment and proliferation. The Si and Ca ion concentrations of the cell culture medium in the presence of three different calcium silicate cements seeded with MG63 cells were measured. Kinetic immunofluorescent staining of MG63 cells was performed during cell attachment and spreading. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was employed to determine gene expression in MG63 cells cultured on the cements. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate the significance of the differences between the mean values. Results The working time (47 min) and setting time (1724 min) of the cements were shortened with an increase in the Ca content of the calcium silicate powders after mixing the powder with water. In contrast, the higher the Si content in the cement, the more the MG63 cells attached to the cement at all culture time-points, accompanying by the formation of more obvious actin stress fibres. Cell proliferation and differentiation increased significantly (P < 0.05) with an increase in the Si content of the calcium silicate cements. Si ion concentration of the culture medium increased significantly (P < 0.05) with increasing cement Si content and culture time-points. Conclusions The higher Si content cement enhanced the higher expression of cell attachment, proliferation and differentiation as compared to the lower Si content cement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据