4.5 Article

Pulp canal obliteration: an endodontic diagnosis and treatment challenge

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 177-197

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01963.x

关键词

dental trauma; discolouration; pulp canal obliteration; root canal treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To review the literature on pulp chamber and root canal obliteration in anterior teeth and to establish a clear protocol for managing teeth with fine, tortuous canal systems. Summary Pulp canal obliteration (PCO) occurs commonly following traumatic injuries to teeth. Approximately 424% of traumatized teeth develop varying degrees of pulpal obliteration that is characterized by the apparent loss of the pulp space radiographically and a yellow discoloration of the clinical crown. These teeth provide an endodontic treatment challenge; the critical management decision being whether to treat these teeth endodontically immediately upon detection of the pulpal obliteration or to wait until symptoms or signs of pulp and or periapical disease occur. The inevitable lack of responses to normal sensibility tests and the crown discoloration add uncertainty to the management; however, only approximately 727% of teeth with PCO will develop pulp necrosis with radiographic signs of periapical disease. Root canal treatment of teeth with pulpal obliteration is often challenging. This article discusses the various management approaches and highlights treatment strategies for overcoming potential complications. Key learning points Up to 25% of traumatized anterior teeth can develop pulp canal obliteration; Discolouration is a common clinical finding in teeth with pulp canal obliteration; Up to 75% of teeth with pulp canal obliterations are symptom-free and require no treatment other than radiographic monitoring; Routine pulp sensibility tests are unreliable in the presence of pulp canal obliteration; Teeth with pulp canal obliteration in need of root canal treatment pose particular diagnostic and treatment challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据