4.5 Article

Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis, planning and follow up of a type III dens invaginatus case

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 198-208

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01956.x

关键词

anomalies; cone beam computed tomography; dens invaginatus; endodontic surgery; endodontic treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To present the case of a maxillary left lateral incisor with Oehlers type III dens invaginatus in which cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used as an adjunctive resource in the diagnosis as well as in the planning and 2-year follow-up of the nonsurgical/surgical treatment. Summary The tooth had two root canals: a primary (main) canal with vital pulp that appeared to be closed apically and an invaginated canal that was necrotic, wide-open at the portal of exit and associated with a large chronic periapical lesion extending to the apex of the maxillary left central incisor. Radiographic tracking of a sinus tract in the labial gingiva of the affected tooth with a gutta-percha point revealed its origin to be the invagination. The CBCT scans revealed that the periapical radiolucency was significantly larger than seen radiographically as well as an increased thickness of the buccal cortical plate. Conventional root canal treatment of the primary canal was undertaken. As nonsurgical access to the invaginated canal was not possible, endodontic surgery was performed for curettage of the lesion, root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic tips and root canal filling with white mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). CBCT scanning after 17 months and clinical and radiographic follow-up after 24 months revealed complete periapical repair and absence of symptoms. Key learning points The combination of nonsurgical and surgical treatments produced periapical repair in a tooth with type III dens invaginatus with two root canals. CBCT may aid the diagnosis as well as the management plan and follow-up of teeth with this developmental anomaly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据