4.6 Review

Mitigation strategies of hydrogen sulphide emission in sewer networks - A review

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.02.013

关键词

Chemical addition; Corrosion; Hydrogen sulphide; Odour

资金

  1. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [ARQ2011410041004] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) gas emission in sewer networks is associated with several problems including the release of dangerous odour to the atmosphere and sewer pipe corrosion. The release of odour can endanger public health and corrode sewer pipe walls. Sewer corrosion has the potential to cost water utilities millions of dollars to maintain and rehabilitate the affected sewer pipes. Some chemical mitigation strategies to control hydrogen sulphide emission have been introduced. These include but are not limited to the injection of oxygen, magnesium and sodium hydroxide, calcium nitrate and iron salts. The optimisation of the dosing rate and location of each chemical mitigation strategy is required to achieve maximum hydrogen sulphide gas removal efficiency along with cost effectiveness. In this review paper, the five most popular chemical mitigation strategies that were previously mentioned have been investigated and discussed. The article is broken down into three main discussions. Firstly the sewer transformation processes and factors affecting the hydrogen sulphide generation and emission are highlighted. Secondly, comparisons and differences between each selected chemical mitigation strategy as well as its application covered. Finally, the review of the chemical efficiency and cost is conducted by comparing two case studies in controlling the formation of dissolved sulphide. It was found that the injection of oxygen is the cheapest mitigation strategy of hydrogen sulphide gas generation in sewers, but least effective. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据