4.6 Article

Recovery of mitosporic fungi actively growing in soils after bacterial bioremediation of oily sludge and their potential for removing recalcitrant hydrocarbons

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.12.014

关键词

Oily sludge; Hydrocarbon removal; Recalcitrant contaminants; Fungal diversity

资金

  1. Science Faculty of Universidad de los Andes and Biointech Ltda.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial bioremediation is a widely used technique to remove or neutralize contaminants. However, the enzymatic capabilities of bacteria are limited and, consequently, recalcitrant compounds remain in the soil. Fungi can help to overcome this drawback, since their enzymatic repertoire is extensive. In this study, the diversity of viable, actively growing, filamentous fungi was explored in soils previously subjected to bioremediation with bacterial consortia from three petroleum exploitation fields. Diversity was estimated using both morphological traits and ITS rDNA sequencing. We recovered a highly diverse group of morphotypes from each field, most of them previously reported genera of fungi associated with bioremediation (Aspergillus, Paecilotnyces, and Penicilliurn), but a high proportion (40%) of the fungal species detected have never previously been reported as being involved in degradation of hydrocarbons. To build evidence of the isolates as potential bioremediation agents, their laccase and peroxidase activities were measured in vitro; peroxidase activity was a common trend in these fungi. The detection of peroxidase activity suggests adaptation of these fungi to the residual contaminants after bacterial action. Bioaugmentation of the fungal isolates in microcosms contaminated with oily sludge resulted in higher removal of the asphaltenic fraction compared to no bioaugmented microcosms. Our method allowed us to screen for and isolate viable mycelia within a contaminated environment, a strategy efficient for our environmental protection goals. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据