4.3 Article

Allergic Sensitization to Bovine beta-Lactoglobulin: Comparison between Germ-Free and Conventional BALB/c Mice

期刊

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000151507

关键词

Germ-free mice; BALB/c mice; Allergy; Sensitization; beta-Lactoglobulin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The 'hygiene hypothesis' suggests that high hygienic standards met in western countries lead to a lack of microbial exposure, thus promoting the development of atopy by preventing the proper maturation of the immune system. Germ-free animals are deprived of the immune stimulation that occurs during postnatal gut colonization by commensal bacteria. Germ-free mice could thereby provide an attractive model for studying the impact of gut microbiota on the development of Th2-mediated disorders such as allergy. Methods: Germ-free and conventional BALB/c mice were sensitized to beta-lactoglobulin (BLG), a major cow's milk allergen, by means of intraperitoneal injections in the presence of incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Time courses of serum and fecal BLG-specific antibody responses were monitored and cytokine production was assayed in BLG-reactivated splenocytes. Results: Serum BLG-specific IgG1 and IgE concentrations were significantly higher in germ-free mice during the primary immune response and IgE production persisted longer in germ-free mice. Furthermore, secretion of BLG-specific IgA was evidenced only in feces from germfree mice while, in contrast, fecal IgG1 concentrations were at least 3-fold higher in conventional mice than in germ-free mice. Production of IL-5, IL-10 and IFN-gamma was 3-fold enhanced in BLG-reactivated splenocytes from germ-free mice. Conclusion: The absence of gut microbiota significantly affects the BLG-specific immune response in BALB/c mice, thus suggesting that this model might be of interest for further studies exploring the influence of gut colonization by different bacterial strains on the development of an allergic-type sensitization. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据