4.2 Article

Prevalence of Airflow Limitation in Patients Diagnosed and Treated for Symptoms of Chronic Bronchitis by General Practitioners in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 50, 期 20, 页码 2277-2283

出版社

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.5115

关键词

chronic bronchitis; airflow; pulmonary function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Physicians have provided care to only 0.2 million of the 5.3 million Japanese over the age of 40 years old who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Among such individuals, many patients with respiratory symptoms diagnosed as chronic bronchitis (CB) are prescribed mainly expectorants. To determine the current status of COPD subjects diagnosed with and treated for CB, we investigated the prevalence of airflow limitation (AFL) in CB patients diagnosed by general practitioners (GPs) and the therapies administered to them. Methods Patients receiving treatment by GPs as CB completed a questionnaire and the FEV1/FEV6 ratio was measured by their GPs with a Piko-6. The prevalence of AFL (FEV1/FEV6 <73%) and the correlation between FEV1/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC were examined. Prescription behavior and comorbid lifestyle diseases were also examined. Results Data from 197 patients with CB were analyzed. Among those who underwent spirometry, the correlation between FEV1/FVC and FEV1/FEV6 was r(2)=0.38 (p<0.0001), and the sensitivity and specificity of the Piko-6 were 85.7% and 61.1%, respectively. The prevalence of AFL was 47.2% and increased to 54.1% among patients aged 70-79 years. Expectorants were prescribed for 39.8% of CB patients with AFL, but inhaled bronchodilators were prescribed for only 22.6%. Smoking history and age were significantly higher in the group with AFL than in those without AFL (p<0.05). The prevalence of comorbid lifestyle diseases was 73.1% in patients with AFL. Conclusion AFL was prevalent among patients with CB. Therefore, GPs should test pulmonary function in CB patients to ensure that the appropriate therapy is administered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据