4.4 Review

Pathophysiological role of blood-borne tissue factor: should the old paradigm be revisited?

期刊

INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 29-34

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-010-0423-4

关键词

Coagulation; Vulnerable blood; Blood-borne tissue factor; Acute coronary syndromes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The term vulnerable plaque identifies atherosclerotic lesions prone to rupture. Plaque disruption facilitates the interaction of the inner components of the lesion, tissue factor (TF) among them, with the flowing blood. This results in activation of the coagulation cascade, ultimately leading to thrombus formation, and abrupt vascular occlusion. Despite the central role of vulnerable plaques in the onset of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there are certain conditions (e.g., eroded plaques) where a hyperactive, vulnerable blood, may play a predominant pathophysiological role. Recently, two distinct pools of circulating TF have been identified. One, associated with cell-derived microparticles probably originating from apoptotic cells, such as macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and endothelium. The most recent, blood-borne TF, circulates in an inactive form (encryption) and has to be activated (decryption) to exert its thrombogenic activity. Certain pathological conditions associated with an increased rate of thrombotic complications have been associated with high levels of circulating TF. It is thought that the blood-borne TF perpetuates the initial thrombogenic stimulus, leading to the formation of larger or more stable thrombus, and thus, more severe ACS. Thus, the concept of vulnerable blood could represent a new link between the vulnerable lesion and the high-risk patient. Therefore, the assessment of selected biomarkers associated with vulnerable or hyperreactive blood, e.g., blood-borne tissue factor, may represent a useful tool to identify patients with a high-risk profile of developing major cardiovascular events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据