4.7 Article

Phase equilibria and structural investigations in the system Al-Fe-Si

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 1919-1929

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2011.05.003

关键词

Aluminides; Ternary alloy systems; Phase diagrams; Crystallography

资金

  1. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) [P19305-N19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Al-Fe-Si system was studied for an isothermal section at 800 degrees C in the Al-rich part and at 900 degrees C in the Fe-rich part, and for half a dozen vertical sections at 27, 35, 40,50 and 60 at.% Fe and 5 at.% Al. Optical microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used for initial sample characterization, and Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the annealed samples was used to determine the exact phase compositions. Thermal reactions were studied by Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA). Our experimental results are generally in good agreement with the most recent phase diagram versions of the system Al-Fe-Si. A new ternary high-temperature phase tau(12) (cF96, NiTi2-type) with the composition Al48Fe36Si16 was discovered and was structurally characterized by means of single-crystal and powder XRD. The variation of the lattice parameters of the triclinic phase tau(1) with the composition Al2+xFe3Si3-x (-0.3 < x < 1.3) was studied in detail. For the binary phase FeSi2 only small solubility of Al was found in the low-temperature modification LT-FeSi2 (zeta(beta)) but significant solubility in the high-temperature modification HT-FeSi2 (zeta(alpha)) (8.5 at.% Al). It was found that the high-temperature modification of FeSi2 is stabilized down to much lower temperature in the ternary, confirming earlier literature suggestions on this issue. DTA results in four selected vertical sections were compared with calculated sections based on a recent CALPHAD assessment. The deviations of liquidus values are significant suggesting the need for improvement of the thermodynamic models. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据