4.6 Article

Red blood cell transfusion affects microdialysis-assessed interstitial lactate/pyruvate ratio in critically ill patients with late sepsis

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 11, 页码 1843-1850

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2635-8

关键词

Transfusion; Sepsis; Lactate; Microdialysis; Microcirculation; Metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to explore the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on microdialysis-assessed interstitial fluid metabolic parameters in septic patients. We conducted a retrospective study of 37 patients with severe sepsis/septic shock requiring transfusion of one to two RBC units. Interstitial fluid metabolic alterations were monitored by a microdialysis catheter inserted in the subcutaneous adipose tissue. Samples were collected before (T0) and after transfusion at two time-points: T1a and T1b; median post-transfusion times of 120 [interquartile range (IQR); 45-180] and 360 (IQR; 285-320) min. Lactate, pyruvate, glycerol and glucose concentrations were measured with a bedside analyzer, and the lactate/pyruvate (LP) ratio was calculated automatically. RBC transfusions decreased the LP ratio from (T0) 18.80 [interquartile range (IQR); 14.85-27.45] to (T1a) 17.80 (IQR; 14.35-25.20; P < 0.05) and (T1b) 17.90 (IQR; 14.45-22.75; P < 0.001), while there was also significant interindividual variation. Post-transfusion LP ratio changes at T1a [r = -0.42; 95 % confidence interval (CI), -0.66 to -0.098; P = 0.01] and T1b (r = -0.68; 95 % [CI], -0.82 to -0.44; P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with the pre-transfusion LP ratio, but not with baseline demographic characteristics, vital signs, severity scores, hemoglobin level and blood lactate. RBC storage time and leukocyte reduction had no influence on the tissue metabolic response to transfusion. Tissue oxygenation is affected by RBC transfusion in critically ill septic patients. Monitoring of tissue LP ratio by microdialysis may represent a useful method for individual clinical management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据