4.6 Article

Prognostic value of chromogranin A in severe sepsis: data from the FINNSEPSIS study

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 820-829

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2546-8

关键词

Sepsis; Prognosis; Mortality; Chromogranin A; SAPS II score

资金

  1. University of Oslo
  2. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the prognostic information of chromogranin A (CgA), a marker associated with adrenergic tone and myocardial function, in patients with severe sepsis. CgA levels were measured at the time of study inclusion and 72 h later in 232 patients with severe sepsis recruited from 24 ICUs in Finland (FINNSEPSIS study). Sixty-five patients (28 %) died during the index hospitalization. CgA levels at inclusion and after 72 h correlated with several established indices of risk in sepsis. Patients who died during the hospitalization had higher baseline CgA levels than hospital survivors: 14.0 (Q1-3, 7.4-27.4) versus 9.1 (5.9-15.8) nmol/l, P = 0.002, and after 72 h: 16.2 (9.0-31.1) versus 9.8 (6.0-18.0) nmol/l, P = 0.001. Prior cardiovascular disease (P = 0.04) and cardiovascular SOFA levels on day 3 (P = 0.03) were associated with higher CgA levels after 72 h by linear regression. CgA levels on study inclusion and after 72 h were independently associated with hospital mortality by logistic regression: OR (logarithmically transformed CgA levels) 1.95 (95 % CI 1.01-3.77), P = 0.046 and OR 2.03 (95 % CI 1.18-3.49), P = 0.01, respectively. The prognostic accuracy was comparable for CgA measurements and SAPS II score, and the addition of CgA measurements to the SAPS II score improved risk stratification of the patients as assessed by the category-free net reclassification index. A CgA level > 6.6 nmol/l on study inclusion was associated with septic shock during the hospitalization. CgA levels measured during hospitalization for severe sepsis are associated with cardiovascular dysfunction and may provide additional prognostic information in patients with severe sepsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据