4.6 Article

Gastric residual volume during enteral nutrition in ICU patients: the REGANE study

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 1386-1393

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1856-y

关键词

Enteral nutrition; Gastric residual volume; Mechanical ventilation; Ventilator-associated pneumonia; Intensive care unit

资金

  1. Nestle Nutrition (Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare the effects of increasing the limit for gastric residual volume (GRV) in the adequacy of enteral nutrition. Frequency of gastrointestinal complications and outcome variables were secondary goals. An open, prospective, randomized study. Twenty-eight intensive care units in Spain. Three hundred twenty-nine intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients with enteral nutrition (EN). EN was administered by nasogastric tube. A protocol for management of EN-related gastrointestinal complications was used. Patients were randomized to be included in a control (GRV = 200 ml) or in study group (GRV = 500 ml). Diet volume ratio (diet received/diet prescribed), incidence of gastrointestinal complications, ICU-acquired pneumonia, days on mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay were the study variables. Gastrointestinal complications were higher in the control group (63.6 vs. 47.8%, P = 0.004), but the only difference was in the frequency of high GRV (42.4 vs. 26.8%, P = 0.003). The diet volume ratio was higher for the study group only during the 1st week (84.48 vs. 88.20%) (P = 0.0002). Volume ratio was similar for both groups in weeks 3 and 4. Duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay or frequency of pneumonia were similar. Diet volume ratio of mechanically ventilated patients treated with enteral nutrition is not affected by increasing the limit in GRV. A limit of 500 ml is not associated with adverse effects in gastrointestinal complications or in outcome variables. A value of 500 ml can be equally recommended as a normal limit for GRV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据