4.2 Article

Dynamic physical properties of dissociated tumor cells revealed by dielectrophoretic field-flow fractionation

期刊

INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 850-862

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1039/c1ib00032b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kleberg Center for Molecular Markers
  2. Department of Defense [W81XWH-08-1-0800]
  3. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP100934]
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metastatic disease results from the shedding of cancer cells from a solid primary tumor, their transport through the cardiovascular system as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their engraftment and growth at distant sites. Little is known about the properties and fate of tumor cells as they leave their growth site and travel as single cells. We applied analytical dielectrophoretic field-flow fractionation (dFFF) to study the membrane capacitance, density and hydrodynamic properties together with the size and morphology of cultured tumor cells after they were harvested and placed into single cell suspensions. After detachment, the tumor cells exhibited biophysical properties that changed with time through a process of cytoplasmic shedding whereby membrane and cytoplasm were lost. This process appeared to be distinct from the cell death mechanisms of apoptosis, anoikis and necrosis and it may explain why multiple phenotypes are seen among CTCs isolated from patients and among the tumor cells obtained from ascitic fluid of patients. The implications of dynamic biophysical properties and cytoplasmic loss for CTC migration into small blood vessels in the circulatory system, survival and gene expression are discussed. Because the total capacitance of tumor cells remained higher than blood cells even after they had shed cytoplasm, dFFF offers a compelling, antibody-independent technology for isolating viable CTCs from blood even when they are no larger than peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据