4.6 Article

Suppressive effects of neutrophil by Salp16-like salivary gland proteins from Ixodes persulcatus Schulze tick

期刊

INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 466-474

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imb.12101

关键词

Ixodes persulcatus; Salp16; immunosuppressant; neutrophils

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Scientific Research
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Global Center of Excellence Program, 'Establishment of International Collaboration Centers for Zoonosis Control' from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25257415] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salp16, a 16-kDa tick salivary gland protein, is known to be the molecule involved in the transmission of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, an obligate intracellular pathogen causing zoonotic anaplasmosis, from its mammalian hosts to Ixodes scapularis. Recently, the presence of A. phagocytophilum was documented in Japan and Ixodes persulcatus was identified as one of its vectors. The purpose of this study was to identify Salp16 genes in I. persulcatus and characterize their function. Two cDNA clones encoding the Salp16-like sequences were obtained from the salivary glands of fed female I. persulcatus ticks and designated Salp16 Iper1 and Iper2. Gene expression analyses showed that the Salp16 Iper genes were expressed specifically in the salivary glands and were up-regulated by blood feeding. These proteins attenuated the oxidative burst of activated bovine neutrophils and inhibited their migration induced by the chemoattractant interleukin-8 (IL-8). These results demonstrate that Salp16 Iper proteins contribute to the establishment of blood feeding as an immunosuppressant of neutrophil, an essential factor in innate host immunity. Further examination of the role of Salp16 Iper in the transmission of pathogens, including A. phagocytophilum, will increase our understanding of the tick-host-pathogen interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据