4.6 Article

Regulation of transcription of the Aedes albopictus cecropin A1 gene: A role for p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

期刊

INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 628-636

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.04.001

关键词

Mosquito defence; Antimicrobial peptides; Promoter; C6/36 cells; p38 MAPK; Innate immunity

资金

  1. Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Group of Kingston University
  2. St Georges University of London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulation of the Aedes albopictus cecropin A1 promoter was studied to provide insight into the transcriptional control of this antimicrobial peptide (AMP) gene in mosquitoes. Gene expression levels of cecropin A1 increased in A. albopictus C6/36 cells in response to heat-killed Escherichia colt. Reporter gene assays incorporating -757 to +32 of the A. albopictus cecropin A1 promoter revealed that E. coli could induce expression in these cells with more pronounced expression than that seen with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Analysis of deletion constructs demonstrated that the 5' boundary of the regulatory region for the activation of this AMP was located between -173 and -64. Western blotting with anti-phospho-specific antibodies demonstrated that p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (INK) were activated by LPS, whereas only p38 MAPK was activated by E. coli. Moreover, pharmacological experiments revealed that pre-incubation of cells with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 resulted in a striking activation of the cecropin A1 promoter following immune challenge, demonstrating that p38 MAPK negatively regulates cecropin A1 promoter activity. Finally the region required for the negative regulation by p38 MAPK was identified as being between -173 and -64. This report is the first to show involvement of the p38 MAPK pathway in the negative regulation of AMP production in a mosquito. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据