4.5 Article

Synthesis and electrochemical characterization of [Ru(NCCH3)6]2+, tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)borate, and tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)methane ruthenium(II) complexes

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 470-476

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2013.02.027

关键词

Ruthenium; Tris(pyrazolyl)borate; Tris(pyrazolyl)methane; Acetonitrile complexes

资金

  1. NSF [CHE 0545138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)borato- and tris(pyrazolyl)methano ruthenium(II) complexes would make good synthons in ruthenium chemistry for synthesis of catalysts and DNA binding drugs. However, these complexes are not widely used as starting materials due to the long reaction times and multiple synthetic steps required or the lack of their successful synthesis. We have developed a new synthesis for the ruthenium(II) acetonitrile complex [Ru(NCCH3)(6)](2+) with noncoordinating BF4- or OTf (OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate) counterions. Using this [Ru(NCCH3)(6)](2+) complex, the previously reported tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)borato ruthenium(II) complexes [Tp(R)Ru(NCCH3)(3)](+) (Tp(R) = tris(pyrazolyl)borate; R = H, Me) and the unreported tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)borato ruthenium(II) complex (R = Ph) have been synthesized using an improved synthetic pathway that reduces the number of required steps by up to six and the average synthesis times by up to 45 h. Novel tris(acetonitrile) tris(pyrazolyl)methano ruthenium(II) complexes of the formula [Tpm(R)Ru(NCCH3)(3)](2+) (Tpm(R) = tris(pyrazolyl)methane; R = Me, Ph) have also been synthesized in one step in 12 h using this method. Cyclic voltammetry studies of the synthesized complexes show that Ru2+/(3+) redox potentials generally increase with increasing steric bulk of the Tp(R) or Tpm(R) ligand. The ability to sterically tune Ru2+/3+ redox potentials may be used to promote catalysis development and in the development of ruthenium-based drugs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据