4.5 Article

Synthesis, crystal structure, DNA-binding properties, cytotoxic and antioxidation activities of several ternary copper(II) complexes with a new reduced Schiff base ligand

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 121-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2012.05.014

关键词

Ternary copper(II) complexes Cytotoxicity; DNA-binding properties; Reduce Schiff base; X-ray crystallography; Phenanthroline base

资金

  1. Ministry of Education through National University of Singapore [R143-000-371-112]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21001040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new ternary copper(II) complexes, [Cu-2(phen)(2)(PDIMAla)(H2O)(2)](ClO4)(2)center dot CH3OH (1), [Cu-2(dpq)(2) (PDIMAla)(H2O)(2)](ClO4)(2)center dot CH3OH (2) and [Cu-2(dppq)(2)(PDIMAla)(H2O)(2)](ClO4)(2)center dot CH3OH (3) (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, dpq = dipyrido[3,2:2',3'-f]quinoxaline, dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine, H2PDI-MAla = N,N'-(p-xylylene)di-alanine acid) have been synthesized and the complex 1 has been structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, spectrometric titrations, ethidium bromide displacement experiments, CD (circular dichroism) spectral analysis and viscosity measurements. The results indicate that the three compounds, especially the complex 3, can strongly bind to calf-thymus DNA (CT-DNA). The intrinsic binding constants K-b of the ternary copper(II) complexes with CT-DNA are 0.38 x 10(5), 1.4 x 10(5) and 7.8 x 10(5) for 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Comparative cytotoxic activities of the copper(II) complexes are also determined by acid phosphatase assay. The results show that the ternary copper(II) complexes have significant cytotoxic activity against the human hepatic (HepG2), human promyelocytic leukemia (HL60) and human prostate (PC3) cell lines. Investigation of antioxidation property show that all the copper(II) complexes have strong scavenging effects for hydroxyl radicals. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据