4.5 Article

Synthesis, structures, and urease inhibitory activities of oxovanadium(V) complexes with Schiff bases

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 54-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.11.039

关键词

Schiff base; Oxovanadium complex; Crystal structure; Urease inhibition

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20901036]
  2. Distinguished Young Scholars Program of Higher Education of Liaoning Province [LJQ2011114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of oxovanadium(V) complexes, [VO2L1](2) (1), [VO2L2](2) (2), [VO2L3](2) (3), [VO2L4](2) (4), [VO(OCH3)L-5] (5), and [VO(OCH3)(HOCH3)L-6] (6) (HL1 = 2-ethoxy-6-{[2-(2-hydroxyethylamino)ethylimino]methyl} phenol, HL2 = 4-chloro-2-{[2-(2-hydroxyethylamino)ethylimino]methyl}phenol, HL3 = 2-methoxy-6-[(2-methylaminoethylimino)methyl]phenol, HL4 = 4-chloro-2-[(2-methylaminoethylimino) methyl] phenol, HL5 = N'-(2-hydroxy-3-ethoxybenzylidene)-3-hydroxy-2-naphthohydrazide, and HL6 = N'-(2-hydroxy-5-chlorobenzylidene)-3-hydroxy-2-naphthohydrazide), have been prepared and structurally characterized by physico-chemical methods and X-ray diffraction. The inhibition rates (%) with the concentration of 100 mu M for the complexes on Helicobacter pylori urease are 18.96 +/- 0.44 (1), 33.01 +/- 1.80 (2), 35.83 +/- 0.78 (3), 48.09 +/- 1.23 (4), 45.91 +/- 2.09 (5), and 90.72 +/- 1.91 (6). The relationship between the structures and urease inhibitory activities indicates that the chloro-substituted complexes have stronger activity than the alk-oxy-substituted complexes. It is notable that one of the chloro-substituted complexes has very strong urease inhibitory activity, with IC50 value of 17.35 +/- 1.01 mu M, which is much lower than that of the acetohydroxamic acid coassayed as a standard urease inhibitor. The kinetic studies reveal that the complex is a mixed-competitive inhibitor of urease. The molecular docking study of the complexes with the Helicobacter pylori urease was performed. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据