4.5 Article

Molecular and electronic structures of new iron complexes containing N,S-coordinated o-iminothionebenzosemiquinonate(1-) π radical ligands: An experimental and density functional theoretical study

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 374, 期 1, 页码 226-239

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2011.02.036

关键词

Iron; o-Aminobenzenethiolate; Noninnocent ligands; Electronic structure; DFT

资金

  1. Max-Planck Society
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new o-aminothiophenol type ligands have been synthesized, namely 1,3-propanediamine-N,N'-bis(benzenethiol), H-4(L-1), and 1,2-bis(2-mercapto-3,5-di-tert-butylaniline) ethane, H-4(L-2). The reactions of these ligands with FeBr2 in dry acetonitrile in the presence and absence of air (and other oxidants such as iodine) afforded seven new complexes which were characterized by single-crystal X-ray crystallography and Mossbauer spectroscopy (as well as EPR- and UV-Vis spectroscopies). Their magnetochemistry has been studied and their electronic structures have been established and verified by broken symmetry (BS) density functional theoretical (DFT) calculations using the B3LYP functional. The ligands are redox-active and the o-iminothiophenolate(2-)-o-iminothiobenzosemiquinonate(1-) oxidation levels are chemically readily accessible. The complexes characterized comprise the dimers [Fe-III(L-1(center dot))](2) (S-T = 0) (1); [Fe-III(L-2(center dot))](2) (S-T = 0) (2), and the mononuclear, five coordinate species: [Fe-III(L-1(center dot))I] (S-T = 1/2) (3); [Fe-III(L-2(center dot))I] (S-T = 1/2) (4); [Fe-II(L-1(center dot)){P(CH3)(3)}] (S-T = 0) (5); [Fe-II(L-2(center dot)){P(C6H5)(3)}] (S-T = 0) (6), and [Fe-III(L-2(gma)center dot)((t)py)] (S-T = 1) (7). ((tBu)py) represents 4-tert-butylpyridine and (L-2(gma)center dot)(3) is the pi radical trianion of the one-electron reduced (L-2(gma))(2) which in turn is the oxidized form of (2L)(4) (-4H(+), -2e). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据