4.5 Article

Why physicians teach: giving back by paying it forward

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 773-782

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/medu.12782

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada through a Faculty Development Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ContextDespite the pace and intensity of the in-patient clinical setting, physicians carve out time for teaching medical students and residents. ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to explore what it means for physicians to teach students and residents in the in-patient setting. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 practising physicians from the departments of internal medicine, surgery and paediatrics in three university teaching hospitals at McGill University, using an interpretive phenomenological methodology. ResultsFive themes elucidated the meaning of teaching for physicians in the in-patient setting: (i) teaching was perceived as an integral part of their identity; (ii) teaching allowed them to repay former teachers for their own training; (iii) teaching gave them an opportunity to contribute to the development of the next generation of physicians; (iv) teaching enabled them to learn, and (v) teaching was experienced as personally energising and gratifying. Participants were morally and socially motivated to give time and effort through teaching (e.g. to pay forward their own privilege and thereby help to develop the next generation); teaching also gave them a sense of personal fulfilment (e.g. by allowing them to mould young minds and leave a legacy). ConclusionsThis study holds a number of implications for medical education with relevance to the recruitment and retention of clinical teachers, recognition of clinical teaching, and evidence-informed faculty development. The findings also suggest that teaching in an academic setting can bring joy and fulfilment to practising physicians. Discuss ideas arising from the article at discuss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据