4.7 Article

A Homologous Series of [Fe(H2Bpz2)2(L)] Spin-Crossover Complexes with Annelated Bipyridyl Co-Ligands

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 18, 页码 9809-9817

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic501402q

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/K012568/1, EP/K012576/1, EP/K00512X/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K012576/1, EP/K039202/1, EP/K012568/1, EP/J021156/1, EP/K00512X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J021156/1, EP/K012576/1, EP/K00512X/1, EP/K039202/1, EP/K012568/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new iron(II) complexes [Fe(H(2)Bpz(2))(2)(L)] were prepared (pz = pyrazolyl), where L is dipyrido[3,2-f:2',3'-h]quinoxaline (dpq), dipyrido[3,2-a:2?3?-c]phenazine (dppz), dipyrido[3,2-a:2?3?-c]benzo[i]-phenazine (dppn), and dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c](6,7,8,9-tetrahydro)phenazine (dppc). Crystal structures of [Fe(H(2)Bpz(2))2(dpq)], [Fe(H(2)Bpz(2))(2)(dppz)], and [Fe(H(2)Bpz(2))(2)(dppn)] all reveal stacks of complex molecules formed through pi-pi stacking between interdigitated bipyridyl chelate ligands, often with additional intercalated toluene or uncoordinated bipyridyl ligand (dpq). Molecules of [Fe(H(2)Bpz(2))(2)(dppc)] form a different stacking motif in the crystal, with weaker contacts between individual molecules. Many of the structures also contain channels of disordered solvent, running between the molecular stacks. Despite their different stacking motifs, all these compounds exhibit very gradual thermal spin-crossover (SCO) on cooling, which occur over different temperature ranges but are otherwise quite similar in form. Weak thermal hysteresis in one of these spin equilibria can be attributed to the effects of a change in bipyridyl ligand conformation in the molecular stacks around 150 K, which was observed crystallographically. These results demonstrate that strong mechanical coupling between molecules in a crystal is not sufficient to engineer cooperative SCO switching, if other regions of the lattice are less densely packed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据