4.7 Article

New Water Oxidation Chemistry of a Seven-Coordinate Ruthenium Complex with a Tetradentate Polypyridyl Ligand

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 13, 页码 6904-6913

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic500709h

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886, DE-FG02-07ER15888]
  2. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, & Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-07ER15888] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mononuclear ruthenium(II) complex [Ru](2+) (Ru = Ru(dpp)(pic)(2), where dpp is the tetradentate 2,9-dipyrid-2'-yl-1,10-phenanthroline ligand and pic is 4-picoline) reported by Thummel's group (Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1835-1848) that contains no water molecule in its primary coordination shell is evaluated as a catalyst for water oxidation in artificial photosynthesis. A detailed theoretical characterization of the energetics, thermochemistry, and spectroscopic properties of intermediates allowed us to interpret new electrochemical and spectroscopic experimental data, and propose a mechanism for the water oxidation process that involves an unprecedented sequence of seven-coordinate ruthenium complexes as intermediates. This analysis provides insights into a mechanism that generates four electrons and four protons in the solution and a gas-phase oxygen molecule at different pH values. On the basis of the calculations and corroborated substantially by experiments, the catalytic cycle goes through [(RuIII)-Ru-2](3+) and [Ru-2(V)(O)](3+) to [Ru-1(IV)(OOH)](3+)then [Ru-2(III)(center dot center dot center dot O-3(2))](3+) at pH 0, and through [Ru-3(IV)(O)](2+), [Ru-2(V)(O)](3+), and [Ru-1(IV)(OO)](2+) at pH 9 before reaching the same [Ru-2(III)(center dot center dot center dot O-3(2))](3+) species, from which the liberation of the weakly bound O-2 might require an additional oxidation to form [Ru-3(IV)(O)](2+) to initiate further cycles involving all seven-coordinate species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据