4.7 Article

Photophysical Properties of Substituted Homoleptic and Heteroleptic Phenylimidazolinato Ir(III) Complexes as a Blue Phosphorescent Material

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 21, 页码 12338-12350

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic400950u

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [20550056]
  2. G-COE program (Advanced School for Organic Electronics) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20550056] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iridium complexes are one of the most important materials for fabrication of organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). There are difficulties in the preparation of blue phosphorescent complexes with respect to chromaticity, emission efficiency, and stability of the material, compared with green and red phosphorescent complexes. Control of the frontier orbital energy level (HOMO-LUMO) is the sole method to achieve better blue phosphorescent iridium complexes by appropriate ligand selection and the introduction of adequate substituents. Homoleptic and heteroleptic iridium(III) tris(phenylimidazolinate) complexes were synthesized, and the effect of the substituents on their nature in the excited state was examined. Density functional theory calculation showed that the imidazolinato complexes have the HOMO localized at the iridium d- and phenyl pi-orbitals. The LUMO is also localized on the phenyl moiety with a much higher population than HOMO. This LUMO is quite different from other complexes, such as iridium(III) tris(phenylpyridinate) and tris(phenylpyrazolinate) complexes. Therefore, substitution with pi-electron donating groups and electron withdrawing groups induces blue and red spectral shifts, respectively, which is the reverse shift exhibited by other complexes. The ancillary ligand (acetylacetone) acts as a path for nonradiative deactivation in the blue phosphorescent complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据