4.7 Article

Manganese(II), Iron(II), and Mixed-Metal Metal-Organic Frameworks Based on Chains with Mixed Carboxylate and Azide Bridges: Magnetic Coupling and Slow Relaxation

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 4259-4268

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic302162c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91022017, 21173083]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mn(II) and Fe(II) compounds derived from azide and the zwitterionic 1-carboxylatomethylpyridinium-4-carboxylate ligand are isomorphous three-dimensional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with the sra net, in which the metal ions are connected into anionic chains by mixed (mu-1,1-azide)bis(mu-carboxylate) triple bridges and the chains are cross-linked by the cationic backbones of the zwitterionic ligands. The Mn(II) MOFs display typical one-dimensional antiferromagnetic behavior. In contrast, with one more d electron per metal center, the Fe(II) counterpart shows intrachain ferromagnetic interactions and slow relaxation of magnetization attributable to the single-chain components. The activation energies for magnetization reversal in the infinite- and finite-chain regimes are Delta(tau 1) = 154 K and Delta(tau 2) = 124 K, respectively. Taking advantage of the isomorphism between the Mn(II) and Fe(II) MOFs, we have prepared a series of mixed-metal (Mn1-xFexII)-Fe-II MOFs with x = 0.41, 0.63, and 0.76, which intrinsically feature random isotropic/anisotropic sites and competing antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic interactions. The materials show a gradual antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic evolution in overall behaviors as the Fe(II) content increases, and the Fe-rich materials show complex relaxation processes that may arise for mixed SCM and spin-glass mechanisms. A general trend is that the activation energy and the blocking temperature increase with the Fe(II) content, emphasizing the importance of anisotropy for slow relaxation of magnetization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据