4.7 Article

Easy Access to Silicon(0) and Silicon(II) Compounds

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 8, 页码 4736-4743

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic400357p

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RO 224/60-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different synthetic methodologies of silicon dihalide bridged biradicals of the general formula (L-n center dot)(2)SiX2 (n = 1, 2) have been developed. First, the metathesis reaction between NHC:SiX2 and L-n: (L-n: = cyclic akyl(amino) carbene in a 1:3 molar ratio leads to the products 2 (n = 1, X = Cl), 4 (n = 2, X = CO, 6 (n = 1, X = Br), and 7 (n = 2, X = Br). These reactions also produce coupled NHCs (3, 5) under C-C bond formation. The formation of the coupled NHCs (L-m = cyclic alkyl(amino) carbene substituted N-heterocyclic carbene; m = 3, n = 1 (3) and m = 4, n = 2 (5)) is faster during the metathesis reaction between NHC:SiBr2 and L-n: when compared with that of NHC:SiCl2. Second, the reaction of L-l:SiCl4 (8) (L-l: =:C(CH2)(CMe2)(2)N-2,6-iPr(2)C(6)H(3)) with a non-nucleophilic base LiN(iPr)(2) in a 1:1 molar ratio shows an unprecedented methodology for the synthesis of the biradical (L-l center dot)2SiCl(2) (2). The blue blocks of silicon dichloride bridged biradicals (2, 4) are stable for more than six months under an inert atmosphere and in air for one week. Compounds 2 and 4 melt in the temperature range of 185 to 195 C. The dibromide (6, 7) analogue is more prone to decomposition in the solution but comparatively more stable in the solid state than in the solution. Decomposition of the products has been observed in the UV-vis spectra. Moreover, compounds 2 and 4 were further converted to stable singlet biradicaloid dicarbene-coordinated (L-n:)(2)Si(0) (n = 1 (9), 2 (10)) under KC8 reduction. Compounds 2 and 4 were also reduced to dehalogenated products 9 and 10, respectively when treated with RLi (R = Ph, Me, tBu). Cyclic voltametry measurements show that 10 can irreversibly undergo both one electron oxidation and reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据