4.7 Article

Hexagonally Ordered KLaF4 Host: Phase-Controlled Synthesis and Luminescence Studies

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 23, 页码 12748-12754

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic301566e

关键词

-

资金

  1. DU-DST PURSE Grant
  2. University of Delhi
  3. CSIR, New Delhi, India
  4. DST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments resulting in the successful synthesis of hexagonally ordered KLaF4 have been described for the first time. Syntheses from three different lanthanum precursors and KF under nonaqueous conditions and at atmospheric pressure are presented. The temperature, time of the fluorination reactions, and lanthanum precursor influenced the formation of hexagonal KLaF4. While La((OPr)-Pr-i)(3) and La(acac)(3) yielded hexagonal KLaF4 by their reaction with KF in methanol at 65 degrees C, LaCl3 favored only the formation of cubic KLaF4 at 25 degrees C (room temperature). Size-induced phase transformation from cubic KLaF4 to its hexagonal polymorph has been proposed for the reactions involving La(acac)(3) and La((OPr)-Pr-i)(3) and KF. Rietveld refinement of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern of the hexagonally ordered KLaF4 was successfully carried out in space group P (6) over bar 2m (No. 189) with lattice constants a = 6.5842(3) angstrom and c = 3.8165(3) angstrom. A relatively lower effective phonon energy of 262 cm(-1) observed for the hexagonally ordered KLaF4 (determined from its Raman spectrum) suggests its potential as a host for optically active elements with the possibility of minimized nonradiative processes. The hexagonal KLaF4 sample was doped with Er3+ ion (3 mol %) and systematically investigated by diffuse reflectance, normal emission, and upconversion studies. Strong green emission (S-4(3/2), H-2(11/2) -> I-4(15/2)) has been observed upon 980 and 460 nm excitation. A highly transparent light-emitting polymer [poly(methyl methacrylate)] composite containing hexagonal KLaF4:Er3+ phosphor has also been effectively demonstrated for many potential applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据