4.7 Article

Singlet and Triplet Energy Transfers in Tetra-(meso-truxene)zinc(II)- and Tetra-(meso-tritruxene)zinc(II) Porphyrin and Porphyrin-Free Base Dendrimers

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 22, 页码 11493-11505

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic2013667

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. le Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT)
  3. Centre d'Etudes des Materiaux Optiques et Photoniques de l'Universite de Sherbrooke (CEMOPUS)
  4. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, optical properties, and energy transfer features of four dendrimers composed of meso-tetrasubstituted zinc(II) porphyrin (ZnP) or a free base (P) central core, where the substituents are four truxene (Tru) or four tritruxene dendrons (TriTru), TruP, TriTruP, TruZnP, and TriTruZnP, are reported. Selective excitation of the truxene donors results in a photoinduced singlet energy transfer from the truxenes to the porphyrin acceptor. The rates for singlet energy transfer (k(ET)), evaluated from the change in the fluorescence lifetime of the donors (Tru and TriTru) in the presence and absence of the acceptor (P or ZnP) for TruP, TruZnP, TriTruP, and TriTruZnP, are 5.9, 1.2, 0.87, and 0.74 (ns)(-1) at 298 K and 2.6, 2.6, 2.7, and 1.2 (ns)(-1) at 77 K, respectively. A slow triplet-triplet energy transfer from tnixene to porphyrin cores in glassy 2MeTHF at 77 K is also reported with rates of 1.3 x 10(3) and 0.10 X 10(2) s(-1) for TruZnP and TriTruZnP, respectively. Tithe Dexter mechanism for the triplet energy transfers is considered, these slow rates are easily explained by a poor orbital overlap between the truxene and porphyrin pi systems. The fluorescence quantum yields (Phi(F)) are 0.20 and 0.16 for TruP and TriTruP and 0.08 and 0.10 for TruZnP and TriTruZnP, respectively at 298 K At 298 K, a phosphorescence from TruZnP at 795 nm was also observed and is associated with the ZnP chromophore.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据