4.7 Article

Comparison of the Redox Chemistry of Primary and Secondary Amides of U(IV): Isolation of a U(VI) Bis(imido) Complex or a Homoleptic U(VI) Amido Complex

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 636-646

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic101847b

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of California, Santa Barbara
  2. Department of Energy
  3. UCSB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction of UCl4 with 6 equiv of (LiNHBu)-Bu-t generates the U(IV) homoleptic amide complex [Li(THF)(2)Cl](2)[Li](2)[U((NHBu)-Bu-t)(6)] (1 center dot THF) in 57% yield. In the solid-state, 1 center dot THF exists as a one-dimensional coordination polymer consisting of alternating [Li](2)[U((NHBu)-Bu-t)(6)] and [Li(THF)(2)Cl](2) building blocks. Recrystallization of 1 center dot THF from DME/hexanes affords the monomeric DME derivative, [Li(DME)(2)ClLi](2)[U((NHBu)-Bu-t)(6)] (1 center dot DME), which was also characterized by X-ray crystallography. The oxidation of 1 center dot THF with 1 equiv of AgOTF generates the U(VI) bis(imido) complex [Li(THF)](2)[U((NBu)-Bu-t)(2)((NHBu)-Bu-t)(4)] (2) in low yield. In contrast, oxidation of 1 center dot THF with 1 equiv of 12, in the presence of excess tert-butylamine, cleanly affords the U(VI) bis(imido) U((NBu)-Bu-t)(2)((NHBu)-Bu-t)(2)((NH2Bu)-Bu-t)(2) (3) in 78% yield. We have also explored the reactivity of UCl4 with the lithium salt of a secondary amide. Thus, reaction of 6 equiv of (LiNC5H10) (HNC5H10 = piperidine) with UCl4 in DME produces the U(IV) amide, [Li(DME)][U(NC5H10)(5)] (4). Oxidation of this material with 0.5 equiv of I-2, followed by addition of Li(NC5H10), produces [Li(DME)(3)][U(NC5H10)(6)] (5) in moderate yield. Oxidation of 5 with 0.5 equiv of I-2 generates U(NC5H10)(6) (6) in good yield. The structures of 4-6 were elucidated by X-ray crystallographic analysis, while the magnetic properties of 4 and 5 were investigated by SQUID magnetometry. Additionally, the solution phase redox properties of 5 were examined by cyclic voltammetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据