4.4 Article

High Intensity of End-of-Life Care Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients in the New York State Medicaid Program

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 53, 期 12, 页码 1018-1026

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000437

关键词

cancer; end of life; Medicaid; adolescent; young adult; hospice

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA131847]
  2. Young Adult Program at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  3. Association of Schools of Public Health/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [S3888]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:Little is known about the care that adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients receive at the end of life (EOL).Objective:To evaluate use of intensive measures and hospice and location of death of AYA cancer patients insured by Medicaid in New York State.Design:Using linked patient-level data from the New York State Cancer Registry and state Medicaid program, we identified 705 Medicaid patients who were diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 15 and 29 in the years 2004-2011, who subsequently died, and who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid in the last 60 days of life. We evaluated use of intensive EOL measures (chemotherapy within 14 d of death; intensive care unit care, >1 emergency room visit, and hospitalizations in the last 30 d of life), hospice use, and location of death (inpatient hospice, long-term care facility, acute care facility, home with hospice, home without hospice).Results:75% of AYA Medicaid decedents used at least 1 aspect of intensive EOL care. 38% received chemotherapy in the last 2 weeks of life; 21% received intensive care unit care, 44% had >1 emergency room visit, and 64% were hospitalized in the last month of life. Only 23% used hospice. 65% of patients died in acute care settings, including the inpatient hospital or emergency room.Conclusions:Given the high rates of intensive measures and low utilization of hospice at the EOL among AYA Medicaid enrollees, opportunities to maximize the quality of EOL care in this high-risk group should be prioritized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据