4.7 Article

Photophysical Characteristics and Reactivity of Bis(2,9-di-tert-butyl-1,10-phenanthroline) copper(I)

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 13, 页码 5704-5714

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic802361q

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [ACS-PRF, 42041-AC3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently synthesized sterically constrained copper(l) complex [Cu(dtbp)(2)](+) (1), where dtbp is 2,9-di-tert-butyl-1,10-phenanthroline, exhibits unique photophysical and reactivity properties. Complex 1 (lambda(abs), 425 nm; epsilon, 3100 L M-1 cm(-1); lambda(emission), 599 nm) has the longest metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) emission lifetime (tau, 3260 ns) and largest quantum yield (phi, 5.6%) of all (Cu(R(2)phen)(2)](+) complexes, Complex 1 also exhibits a large positive reduction potential for the [Cu2+(dtbp)(2)]I[Cu+(dtbp)(2)] couple (E-1/2 = 0.70 V vs Fc(+/0)) and a large negative excited-state reduction potential for the [Cu2+(dtbp)(dtbp(-center dot))]I[Cu2+(dtbp)(2)] couple (E-1/2 = -1.66 V vs Fc(+/0)), indicating that this complex is a potent photoreductant in the excited state. The steric constraint imposed by the t-butyl substituents in 1 enables unusual ligand replacement reactivity. Either CH3CN or CO replaces one of the dtbp ligands, a reaction that is readily followed by loss of the unique emission signature of 1. Monodentate CH3CN binds to the copper(l) center with an affinity 2 orders of magnitude greater than that of the displaced dtbp, despite the fact that the displaced ligand is bidentate. CO-induced displacement of dtbp from 1 is reversible, but only in the presence of I equiv of unbound dtbp. The exceptionally strong donor ligand CH3NC displaces both dtbp ligands from 1. In contrast to the facile ligand displacement reactivity With good donor ligands, 1 does not react readily with O-2, by either a ligand displacement or an oxidative pathway. Rather, O-2 induces partial quenching of emission via an outer-sphere interaction with 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据