4.7 Article

Postsynthetic Modification: A Versatile Approach Toward Multifunctional Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 15, 页码 7341-7349

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic900796n

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA095298, 3R01 CA095298-07S1, R01 CA095298-07S1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An isoreticular metal-organic framework (IRMOF-3) containing 2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (NH2-BDC) as a building block is shown to undergo chemical modification with a diverse series of anhydrides and isocyanates. The modification of IRMOF-3 by these reagents has been evidenced by using a variety of methods, including NMR and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and the structural integrity of the modified MOFs has been confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis, powder X-ray diffraction, and gas sorption analysis. The results show that a variety of functional groups can be introduced onto the MOF including amines, carboxylic acids, and chiral groups. Furthermore, it is shown that tert-butyl-based asymmetric anhydrides can be used to selectively deliver chemical payloads to the IRMOF. Finally, the results demonstrate that at least four different chemical modifications can be performed on IRMOF-3 and that the reaction conditions can be modulated to control the relative abundance of each group. The findings presented here demonstrate several important features of postsynthetic modification on IRMOF-3, including (1) facile introduction of a wide range of functional groups using simple reagents (e.g., anhydrides and isocyanates), (2) the introduction of multiple (as many as four different) substituents into the MOF lattice, and (3) control over reaction conditions to preserve the crystallinity and microporosity of the resultant MOFs. The findings clearly illustrate that postsynthetic modification represents a powerful means to access new MOF compounds with unprecedented chemical complexity, which may serve as the basis of multifunctional materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据