The title compounds, [AnO(2)(18-crown-6)](n+), An = U, Np, and Pu and n = 1 and 2, as well as the related (experimentally observed) complex [UO2(dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6)](2+). are studied using relativistic density functional theory (DFT). Different relativistic methods (large-core and small-core effective core potentials, all-electron scalar four-component) and two flavors of approximate DFT (B3LYP and PBE) are used. Calculated bond lengths agree well with the available experimental data for the Np-v complex, while larger differences for the U-VI complexes appear to be related to the large uncertainties in the experimental data. The axial An=O bonds are found to be weaker and longer than in the corresponding penta-aquo complexes, though still of partial triple-bond character. The An=O bond lengths and strengths decrease along the actinide series, consistent with the actinide contraction. Gas-phase binding energies calculated for the penta-aquo complexes and crown-ether complexes of the actinides studied, as well as ligand-exchange energies, show that there is no intrinsic preference, or better fit, for actinyl(V) cations as compared to actinyl(VI) ones. Rather, the ability of NPO2+ (Np-V) to form in-cavity 18-crown-6 complexes in water, which is impossible for UO22+, is traced to solvation effects in polar solvents. Thus, the experimentally observed stabilization of the pentavalent oxidation state as compared to the hexavalent one is due to the effective screening of the charge provided by the macrocycle, and this leads to destabilization of the An(VI) crown complexes relative to their An(V) counterparts.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据