4.7 Article

Pressure-ohmic-thermal sterilization: A feasible approach for the inactivation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.03.005

关键词

High pressure processing; Heat; Electric field; Spore; Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Geobacillus stearothermophilus

资金

  1. Ohio State University Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC)
  2. Food Innovation Center
  3. Center for Advanced Processing and Packaging Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy of a pressure-ohmic-thermal sterilization (POTS) for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spore inactivation was investigated. Spores (2.5 x 10(8) cfu/ml) were inoculated in 0.1% NaCl solution (pH 5.0 and 7.0), green pea puree (pH 6.1), carrot puree (pH 5.0) or tomato juice (pH 4.1). Samples were ohmically (50 V/cm) treated at 600 MPa and 105 degrees C for various holding times using a laboratory-scale high-pressure processor. B. amyloliquefaciens and G. stearothermophilus spores suspended in 0.1% NaCl solution (pH 7.0) were inactivated by 4.6 and 5.6 log, respectively, for a 30-min holding time. B. amyloliquefaciens and G. stearothermophilus spores in tomato juice were reduced by 3.1 and 4.8 log, respectively, for a 10-min holding time. Spore germination was highest in the G. stearothermophilus suspended in 0.1% NaCl solution (pH 7.0). POTS treatment appears to be a potent method for inactivating pressure-thermal resistant bacterial spores. Industrial Relevance: Food industry is interested in developing superior quality low-acid shelf-stable foods. This study evaluated the pressure-ohmic-thermal sterilization (POTS) for the inactivation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus stearothermophilus endospores. The impact of food matrices and acidity on the spore resistance was also investigated. Knowledge gained from the study will help the food processors for understanding the importance of various POTS treatment parameters for sterilization of low-acid foods. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据