4.3 Article

Child injury: using national emergency department monitoring systems to identify temporal and demographic risk factors

期刊

INJURY PREVENTION
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 74-80

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040816

关键词

-

资金

  1. Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences at Liverpool John Moores University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Injury is a leading cause of death in children. Emergency department (ED) data offer a potentially rich source of data on child injury. This study uses an emerging national ED data collection system to examine sociodemographics and temporal trends in child injury attendances in England. Methods Cross sectional examination of ED attendances for key injury types made by children aged 0-14years between April 2010 and March 2011 (road traffic injury (RTI) n=21670; assault n=9529; deliberate self harm (DSH) n=3066; sports injury n=88250; burns n=22222; poisoning n=12446). Multivariate analyses examined the impact of demographics (age, gender, residential deprivation) and temporal events (day, month, school and public holidays) on risk of attendance for different injury types. Results For most injury types, attendance increased with deprivation. The attendance ratio between children from the poorest and richest deprivation quintiles was greatest for assaults (4.21:1). Conversely, sports injury attendance decreased with deprivation. Males made more attendances than females for all but DSH. Age and temporal profiles varied by injury type. Assault attendances reduced at weekends while burns attendances increased. RTI and sports injury attendances were increased during school term times. Conclusions ED data can provide a major epidemiological resource for examining both temporal and demographic risks of child injury. Emerging systems, such as the one analysed here, can already inform the targeting of prevention, and with improved data coding and use, their utility would be greatly strengthened.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据