4.0 Article

Carbon dioxide is largely responsible for the acute inflammatory effects of tobacco smoke

期刊

INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 543-551

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/08958370903555909

关键词

Cigarette; lung; inflammation; PP2A; NF kappa B

资金

  1. Biorebus company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tobacco smoking is responsible for a vast array of diseases, particularly chronic bronchitis and lung cancer. It is still unclear which constituent(s) of the smoke is responsible for its toxicity. The authors decided to focus on carbon dioxide, since its level of concentration in mainstream cigarette smoke is about 200 times higher than in the atmosphere. The authors previously demonstrated that inhalation of carbon dioxide concentrations above 5% has a deleterious effect on lungs. In this study, the authors assessed the inflammatory potential of carbon dioxide contained in cigarette smoke. Mice were exposed to cigarette smoke containing a high or reduced CO2 level by filtration through a potassium hydroxyde solution. The inflammatory response was evaluated by histological analysis, protein phosphatase 2 A (PP2A) and nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B activation, and proinflammatory cytokine secretion measurements. The data show that the toxicity of cigarette smoke may be largely due to its high level of CO2. Pulmonary injuries consequent to tobacco smoke inhalation observed by histology were greatly diminished when CO2 was removed. Cigarette smoke exposure causes an inflammatory response characterized by PP2A and NF-kappa B activation followed by proinflammatory cytokine secretion. This inflammatory response was reduced when the cigarette smoke was filtered through a potassium hydroxide column, and reestablished when CO2 was injected downstream from the filtration column. Given that there is an extensive literature linking a chronic inflammatory response to the major smoking-related diseases, these data suggest that carbon dioxide may play a key role in the causation of these diseases by tobacco smoking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据