4.6 Article

Infrared radiation modeling of NO, OH, CO, H2O, and CO2 for emissivity/radiance prediction at high temperature

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 283-291

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2014.08.003

关键词

Radiation modeling; Line-by-line method; Spectrum simulation; Radiation database

资金

  1. Low Observable Technology Research Center program of Defense Acquisition Program Administration
  2. Agency for Defense Development
  3. National Institute of Supercomputing and Network/Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information [KSC-2014-C2-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, infrared radiation modeling of NO, OH, CO, H2O, and CO2 molecules was devised based on a line-by-line method by utilizing a structured radiation analysis package, SPRADIAN07, coupled with up-to-date spectroscopic parameters and recent high-resolution radiation databases. An infrared calculation module was newly implemented in SPRADIAN07 for simulating the emissivity/radiance of NO and OH. The line positions of NO and OH molecules were determined by diagonalizing the Hamiltonian matrices of each molecule. The Einstein coefficients were obtained from either radiation databases or available calculated temperature-related line intensities. H2O, CO2, and CO were also modeled based on the high-resolution radiation databases, HITEMP2010 and CDSD-4000. When the line-by-line calculations were performed using the radiation databases, a parallel computing technique based on PC clusters was adopted for fast and efficient evaluation. The line-by-line model devised in the present study was validated by comparing the results with existing measurements. The simulations with room air absorption composed of H2O and CO2 were also carried out. The spectra taken from a plasma torch and those from a rocket plume were calculated by utilizing the present radiation model. It was shown that the calculated spectra are in good agreement with observed ones. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据