4.5 Article

Applying model-driven engineering to the development of Rich Internet Applications for Business Intelligence

期刊

INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 411-431

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-012-9402-9

关键词

Rich Internet Applications; Knowledge management; Sm4RIA; Model-driven Web engineering

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport under FPU program [AP2007-03076]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under SONRIA project [TIN2010-15789]
  3. University of Alicante through DIMENRIA research project [GRE10-23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Business Intelligence (BI) applications have been gradually ported to the Web in search of a global platform for the consumption and publication of data and services. On the Internet, apart from techniques for data/knowledge management, BI Web applications need interfaces with a high level of interoperability (similar to the traditional desktop interfaces) for the visualisation of data/knowledge. In some cases, this has been provided by Rich Internet Applications (RIA). The development of these BI RIAs is a process traditionally performed manually and, given the complexity of the final application, it is a process which might be prone to errors. The application of model-driven engineering techniques can reduce the cost of development and maintenance (in terms of time and resources) of these applications, as they demonstrated by other types of Web applications. In the light of these issues, the paper introduces the S(m)4RIA-B methodology, i.e., a model-driven methodology for the development of RIA as BI Web applications. In order to overcome the limitations of RIA regarding knowledge management from the Web, this paper also presents a new RIA platform for BI, called RI@BI, which extends the functionalities of traditional RIAs by means of Semantic Web technologies and B2B techniques. Finally, we evaluate the whole approach on a case study-the development of a social network site for an enterprise project manager.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据