4.7 Article

Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 507, 期 -, 页码 684-699

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.08.024

关键词

Three-way decision; Decision-theoretic rough set; Multiset; Multiset-valued information table

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the South -Central University for Nationalities [CZQ16013]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201707780022]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11571010, 61179038, 61502419, 61374085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of three-way decisions is to divide a universe into three pair-wise disjoint regions and to act on some or all of these regions using appropriate strategies. The decision theoretic rough set model, a typical three-way decision model, trisects a universe using a pair of thresholds computed from loss functions. Previous studies of decision-theoretic rough set models do not consider loss functions based on multiset values and are unable to deal with multiset-valued information tables. In this paper, two generalized decision-theoretic rough set models involving multiset-valued data are proposed, namely a multiset-decision-theoretic rough set model and a multiset-fuzzy-decision-theoretic rough set model. Two methods are introduced that compute expected costs from loss functions. The first method is based on the mutiset addition and a new normal-multiset multiplication. The second method is based on a new concept known as the p-length of finite normal multisets. These two methods offer different ways of building multiset-decision-theoretic rough set models. By integrating the multiset-decision-theoretic rough set model with the fuzzy decision-theoretic rough set model, a multiset-fuzzy-decision-theoretic rough set model is created, a model which considers fuzzy relations in multiset-valued information tables. An example that recommends different home options is given to illustrate these models. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据