4.7 Article

Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 716-734

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.04.025

关键词

Group decisions making; Visual information feedback mechanism; Triangular fuzzy complementary preference relation; Consensus; Risk attitude

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71101131, 71331002]
  2. Humanities and Social Science Projects of Chinese Ministry of Education [10YJC630277]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [LR13G010001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A visual information feedback mechanism for group decision making (GDM) problems with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations (TFCPRs) is investigated. The concepts of similarity degree (SD) between two experts as well as the proximity degree (PD) between an expert and the rest of experts in the group are developed for TFCPRs. The consensus level (CL) is defined by combining SD and PD, and a feedback mechanism is proposed to identify experts, alternatives and corresponding preference values that contribute less to consensus. The novelty of this feedback mechanism is that it will provide each expert with visual representations of his/her consensus status to easily 'see' his/her consensus position within the group as well as to identify the alternatives and preference values that he/she should be reconsidered for changing in the subsequent consensus round. The feedback mechanism also includes individualised recommendation to those identified experts on changing their identified preference values and visual graphical simulation of future consensus status if the recommended values were to be implemented. Based on the continuous ordered weighted average (COWA) operator, the triangular fuzzy COWA (TF-COWA) operator is defined, and a novel attitudinal expected score function for TFCPRs is developed. The advantage of this function is that the alternatives are ranked by taking into account the attitudinal character of the group of experts or its moderator if applicable. Additionally, a ranking sensitivity analysis of the attitudinal expected score function with respect to the attitudinal parameter is provided. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据