4.7 Article

Credit portfolio management using two-level particle swarm optimization

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 162-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.005

关键词

Credit portfolio management; Genetic algorithm; Particle swarm optimization; Two-level particle swarm optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71071028, 71021061, 70931001, 61070162]
  2. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [61225012]
  3. Specialized Research Fund of the Doctoral Program of Higher Education for the Priority Development Areas [20120042130003]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20110042110024, 20100042110025]
  5. Specialized Development Fund for the Internet of Things from the ministry of industry and information technology of the P.R. China
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N110204003]
  7. HICU CRCG
  8. Hung Hing Ying Physical Sciences Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a novel Two-level Particle Swarm Optimization (TLPSO) to solve the credit portfolio management problem. A two-date credit portfolio management model is considered. The objective of the manager is to minimize the maximum expected loss of the portfolio subject to a given consulting budget constraint. The captured problem is very challenging due to its hierarchical structure and its time complexity, so the TLPSO is designed for the credit portfolio management model. The TLPSO has two searching processes, namely, internal-search, the searching process of the maximization problem and external-search, the searching process of the minimization problem. The performance of TLPSO is then compared with both the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), in terms of efficient frontiers, fitness values, convergence rates, computational time consumption and reliability. The experiment results show, that TLPSO is more efficient and reliable for the credit portfolio management problem than the other tested methods. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据