4.7 Article

Lithiation of ZnO nanowires studied by in-situ transmission electron microscopy and theoretical analysis

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 313-322

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.05.004

关键词

Li-ion batteries; ZnO; Stress; Oxides; Fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation - China project [11374027]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2132014]
  3. Special Projects for Development of National Major Scientific Instruments and Equipment [2012YQ03007508]
  4. start-up funds at Purdue University
  5. Haythornthwaite Foundation Initiation Grant from American Society of Mechanical Engineering - United States

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transition-metal oxides constitute an important family of high-capacity anodes for Li-ion batteries. ZnO is a model material due to the high theoretical capacity and its representative reaction mechanism upon lithiation. We investigate the structural evolution, mechanical degradation, and stress-regulated electrochemical reactions of ZnO nanowires during the first lithiation through coordinated in-situ transmission electron microcopy experiments, continuum theories, and first-principles computation. Lithiation induces a field of stress in ZnO nanowires. The stress field mediates the electrochemical reaction and breaks the planar solid-state reaction front into a curved interface. The tensile stress in the lithiated shell causes surface fracture in the basal plane of nanowires. The compressive stress in the unlithiated core retards local reactions and results in an uneven lithiation on a given basal plane. We also observe that metallic Zn nanoparticles aggregate in the amorphous matrix of the reaction products. At a critical size, Zn nanoparticles impede the propagation of the reaction front due to the thermodynamically unfavorable lithiation reaction. The results provide fundamental perspectives on the chemomechanical behaviors of oxides for the next-generation Li-ion batteries. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据