4.7 Article

Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 58-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.014

关键词

Uncertain linguistic variable; Intuitionistic fuzzy set; Group decision; Geometric operator

资金

  1. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [10YJA630073, 09YJA630088]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2011FM036]
  3. Social Science Planning Project Fund of Shandong Province [09BSHJ03]
  4. Soft Science Project Fund of Shandong Province [2009RKA376]
  5. Doctor Foundation of Shandong Economic University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With respect to multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems in which the attribute weights and the expert weights take the form of real numbers and the attribute values take the form of intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables, new group decision making methods have been developed. First, operational laws, expected value definitions, score functions and accuracy functions of intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables are introduced. Then, an intuitionistic uncertain linguistic weighted geometric average (IULWGA) operator and an intuitionistic uncertain linguistic ordered weighted geometric (IULOWG) operator are developed. Furthermore, some desirable properties of these operators, such as commutativity, idempotency, monotonicity and boundedness, have been studied, and an intuitionistic uncertain linguistic hybrid geometric (IULHG) operator, which generalizes both the IULWGA operator and the IULOWG operator, was developed. Based on these operators, two methods for multiple attribute group decision making problems with intuitionistic uncertain linguistic information have been proposed. Finally, an illustrative example is given to verify the developed approaches and demonstrate their practicality and effectiveness. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据